Why is Agile Testing adopted as your Application Testing Strategy?
Agile Testing Services |
In
an increasingly IT enabled digital landscape software applications are being
launched at an alarming rate. This is primarily to thwart competition and
garner the elusive customer pie by businesses. This development can be
bracketed into two dimensions. One, customers have become tech savvy and want
their software applications to be of the best quality. They also want the
applications to be updated from time to time underpinned by the emerging technologies
and threats.
The
second dimension is about companies trying to keep pace with the changing
customer preferences and market dynamics. Companies are indeed finding it
challenging to meet the twin objectives of bringing applications (or their
updates) at a faster rate and ensuring their quality each and every time. The
latter requirement brings in the need for quality testing, which in the
traditional waterfall model is not effective enough. To meet the evolving
quality testing challenges, businesses have begun to implement Agile testing as the new testing
approach.
The
reason why Agile testing has
gained ground amongst the testing community, not to speak of the other
stakeholders, is the inadequacy of the traditional waterfall testing model. In
a traditional testing setup, the testing is carried out post the development of
an application. Since the testing here is primarily manual, its full rigour
across deliverables and platforms is not carried out to its entirety. Moreover,
it is difficult to carry out manual testing on a repetitive basis for all
variables in each and every test environment. This reduces the test coverage
area quite drastically.
In
the final analysis, the traditional way of testing leaves a lot to be desired
and lets glitches to go unchecked. Also, even when the glitches are identified
and sent back to the development team for correction, the process consumes
time. Moreover, the fact that the rewritten code needs to be tested again
increases the lead time and cost of the project. The outcome of a poor test
coverage area, lack of communication between the testing and development teams,
lack of proper usability testing, and unrealistic schedules leads to the
delivery of a poor quality application with less or no takers.
Agile test automation, on the other hand, is more coherent, time
and cost saving, focused and helps in better identification and elimination of
glitches. It helps in breaking silos between the development and testing teams,
thus, accelerating the time to market with better quality applications. Let us
delve into the five reasons in which Agile intervention can help the
application testing strategy.
#1 Enhanced Quality: The Agile testing strategy
involves the commencement of testing alongside the development process. It is a
shift-left testing approach that validates the quality of software at the
beginning of the SDLC. Here, testing forms a part of the development phase
wherein the bugs are fixed simultaneously with the development of an
application as opposed to the traditional model. This helps in reducing the
SDLC and enhancing the product quality. In this model, the testing team gets
early insights into the quality issues and helps the development team with
better integration of the software codes.
#2 Comprehensive testing: Since the Agile testing strategy involves the use of automation, the Agile testing experts write test cases
to carry out repetitive tests for a range of dependencies. Thus, they
effectively coordinate and communicate with the development team in identifying
new glitches in the codes. The test automation process helps in the conduct of
complex and repetitive tests thereby increasing the test coverage area. This
significantly increases the chances of identifying glitches and improves the
quality of the application.
#3 Accelerated time to market: Agile application
testing
identifies the presence of bugs quickly in the development phase thanks to its
iterative model. The glitches are corrected and the code gets integrated in the
overall end-to-end software application faster. Since the development and test
cycles are reduced, the application is released into the market quickly.
Moreover, the release of updates is done faster in the Agile set up leading to
a better user experience.
#4 Saving of cost: Since Agile application
testing leads to a shorter product lifecycle and fewer test reruns, the
development and testing cost comes down. Also, in an Agile test setup that
incorporates automation, the software test tools and other resources can be
centralized. This helps in the better procurement of resources leading to their
better utilization and maintenance.
Moreover,
as opposed to the traditional waterfall testing model where post development
testing and integration increases the development cost, the Agile way is
considerably better. Since the unit testing of codes is carried out alongside
development, the quality of software post development is substantially better.
As the software products are delivered faster with smaller lead times, the business
saves costs. This helps the application in maintaining its competitive edge in
the market.
#5 Better productivity: The Agile set up involves the presence of business stakeholders.
This leaves a lesser room for confusion or ego issues that the development and
testing teams suffer from in the traditional testing model. Since the Agile
teams are better organized and cohesive as far as planning and implementation
of the tasks are concerned, they are more efficient and productive. In the
Agile setup, the teams have the authority to go about their business by the
consent of the client thus increasing the ownership of the project.
Conclusion
The
Agile testing methodology is
more flexible, dynamic, and faster to address the requirements of testing. It is
being adopted on a greater scale by enterprises as affirmed by Gartner (about
60 – 80%) and is far better than the traditional waterfall model of testing.
This Article is originally published at Medium.com, 5
Reasons Why Your Application Testing Strategy Needs ‘Agile’ Intervention.
Comments
Post a Comment