Are Automated Testing and Test Automation Different?
![]() |
Automated Testing Vs Test Automation |
When it comes
to DevOps and its outcomes such as Continuous Integration and Testing, the term
"automation" comes into play. Automation means using technology to
finish a task quickly and seamlessly. Automated
testing is quite different from test automation. Automated testing aka continuous testing is the method of
conducting automated tests that are part of the value chain. It helps to derive
feedback on the business-related risks that are associated with a software
release. The feedback helps to get an insight into the feasibility of a
software release. On the other hand, test
automation aims to automate the repetitive manual tasks that a software
engineer-cum-tester would exercise. He or she does so with the help of
functions that utilize the user interface of a system. It mainly produces a set
of fail or pass data points that is concurrent with the requirements of an
application.
Test automation solutions
involve the automation of selected test cases. These cases are meant to
validate the quality of software while conducting integration or regression
tests. This helps testers execute the
process in a faster manner while reducing the test execution time. The
emergence of several test management tools such as Eggplant, Webdriver, and
Selenium has streamlined the automated testing process over a period of time.
Furthermore, these tools target several facets of testing in a fast retrieval
and systematic mode. These help the development team in avoiding any kind of
redundancy.
How
Automated Testing is different from Test Automation
The key
differences between automated testing and test automation can be classified
into three categories namely, time, risk and breadth.
·
Time:
Speed has become a
key differentiator in today’s competitive IT landscape where enterprises rush
to deliver finished products to their demanding customers. As a result, most
organizations are turning to DevOps and Agile to expedite their build, testing,
and delivery processes. Automated
testing mainly focuses on testing the internal systems that were framed and
updated as per the traditional waterfall development model. Now, Agile
processes are becoming the standard where testing takes place in parallel with
development. This helps in hastening the iteration timeframe of the test build.
·
Breadth:
Even though
organizations per se try to avoid the occurrence of large-scale software
failures to save their reputation, minor glitches can create trouble for them
as well. It is important to note that a failed unit test or positive UI test
that is part of the QA automation testing process does not
validate the quality of an overall user experience. To safeguard the end user
experience, the software needs to undergo tests covering a broad canvas. This
helps to detect anomalies related to the inadvertent modifications of an
application, impacting functionality.
·
Risk:
Nowadays, businesses
deliver a number of internal applications as well as complementary pieces of
software to the end users. For example, users can access the procedure of
internal flight booking systems. Also, the complementary pieces of software can
help customers to plan their vacations by availing services such as renting
cars, hotels, etc. Exposing the internal applications containing certain
functionalities to the users can act as a competitive differentiator. However,
it can also increase the complexity and number of potential failure points.
So, if the automated testing process does not
consider the business risks, the test results would not offer any insight to
assess those risks as well. Most tests are devised to offer low-level details
on whether user stories accurately specify the requirements or not.
Test automation
is a part of continuous
testing that scores over the traditional testing method as far as
identifying and removing critical glitches are concerned. Test automation
minimizes the burden of testing needs by tracking different system tests. In
doing so, test automation ensures that testers maintain a standard of quality
at all points along the pipeline. It helps testers to focus more on the effort
and time in creating efficient test cases.
Conclusion
It is
important to understand that no tools or technology platforms can give the
desired results. Like DevOps and Agile, automated testing needs the adoption of
technology, processes, people as well as collaboration with test automation solutions. So, should
business enterprises seek to enhance the productivity of their testing teams by
optimizing the test cases, the application
of automation testing becomes important in the SDLC.
This article
is originally published at it.toolbox.com,
Automated Testing Vs Test Automation - Clearing the Cloud of Confusion.
Diya works
for Cigniti Technologies, Global Leaders in Independent Quality Engineering
& Software Testing Services
to be appraised at CMMI-SVC v1.3, Maturity Level 5, and is also ISO 9001:2015
& ISO 27001:2013 certified.
Comments
Post a Comment